Charleston, W.Va.; December 16th, 2025
A review of first-hand regulatory records related to the proposed West Virginia American Water rate increase shows a process that is, at this stage, procedural in nature, without any formal characterization of public sentiment, opposition, or support contained within the official filings themselves.
Based solely on documents filed directly with the WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and materials issued by WEST VIRGINIA AMERICAN WATER, the record reflects the opening of a rate case, the submission of a formal request for revised rates, and the establishment of a regulatory timetable that includes hearings and opportunities for public comment. The filings themselves do not summarize, quantify, or characterize public opinion.
In its official filing, West Virginia American Water outlines the requested rate adjustments, the proposed phased implementation, and the company’s stated rationale, which centers on infrastructure investment, system upgrades, and regulatory compliance. The filing presents financial figures, investment totals, and projected timelines, all framed within the structure required by PSC rules for utility rate cases.
The PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET, likewise, reflects procedural actions only: acceptance of the filing, assignment of a docket number, scheduling of hearings, and mechanisms for submitting public comments. The docket does not include any language describing public sentiment as divided, supportive, opposed, or otherwise categorized. No summaries of testimony or comment trends appear in the first-hand record at this stage.
Notably, neither the company’s filing nor the PSC’s docket entries contain language evaluating, weighing, or characterizing the substance of public input. The regulatory process, as documented in the official record, remains in its early phases, with formal review ongoing and no findings, conclusions, or staff recommendations yet issued.
From the perspective of first-hand documentation, this distinction matters. Regulatory filings are designed to establish facts, proposals, and procedures, not to editorialize or interpret public reaction. Any characterization of public opinion would typically appear later, if at all, in staff reports, commission orders, or formal summaries issued by the Commission itself.
At present, the first-hand record shows only that a rate increase has been requested, that the request is under review, and that public participation is permitted through established channels. It does not indicate how many comments have been submitted, what positions they take, or whether views are aligned or opposed.
Appalachian Post reviewed the available first-hand documents to determine whether claims of divided public opinion or summarized sentiment were reflected in the official record. Based on that review, no such characterizations appear in the filings or docket entries currently available. This observation reflects the contents of the documents themselves and does not attempt to assess, infer, or speculate about public reaction beyond what is formally recorded.
As the rate case proceeds, additional first-hand materials may be released, including staff analyses, evidentiary summaries, or Commission orders that provide greater detail. Until such documents are issued, the official record remains limited to the company’s proposal and the Commission’s procedural framework.
In regulatory matters, precision matters. Distinguishing between what is formally documented and what may be interpreted elsewhere ensures that readers can understand the process as it exists on the record, without assumptions about sentiment, intent, or outcome.
The Public Service Commission has not yet ruled on the proposed rate increase, and no findings regarding public opinion have been issued. Any future determinations will appear in official Commission documents, which will be reviewed and reported when they become part of the first-hand record.
The Appalachian Post is an independent West Virginia news outlet dedicated to clean, verified, first-hand reporting. We do not publish rumors. We do not run speculation. Every fact we present must be supported by original documentation, official statements, or direct evidence. When secondary sources are used, we clearly identify them and never treat them as first-hand confirmation. We avoid loaded language, emotional framing, or accusatory wording, and we do not attack individuals, organizations, or other news outlets. Our role is to report only what can be verified through first-hand sources and allow readers to form their own interpretations. If we cannot confirm a claim using original evidence, we state clearly that we reviewed first-hand sources and could not find documentation confirming it. Our commitment is simple: honest reporting, transparent sourcing, and zero speculation.
Sources
Primary First-Hand Sources
• WEST VIRGINIA AMERICAN WATER, official rate request filing submitted to the West Virginia Public Service Commission
• WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, docket records and procedural notices related to the rate case
Appalachian Post 
Leave a comment