By the time the year 69 AD drew toward its close, Rome had already endured more upheaval than most generations would see in a lifetime. Emperors had risen and fallen in months, legions had marched against legions, and the authority that once radiated outward from the city had fractured into competing claims backed by steel. It was in this exhausted moment that Antonius Primus, commanding forces loyal to Vespasian, marched into Rome, effectively ending what history would remember as the Year of the Four Emperors.
This was not a ceremonial procession. It was the final movement of a civil war that had begun with the collapse of the Julio-Claudian dynasty and had exposed, with brutal clarity, how power truly functioned in the Roman world.
The Empire After Nero
The crisis began in June 68 AD, when Emperor Nero took his own life as rebellion closed in from multiple provinces. With him ended the Julio-Claudian line that had ruled Rome since Augustus. What followed was not an orderly succession but a vacuum.
The Senate proclaimed Galba emperor, a respected but elderly figure whose authority rested on fragile political consensus rather than firm military loyalty. His reign lasted only months. In January 69 AD, Galba was murdered by soldiers of the Praetorian Guard, who instead elevated Otho, a former ally turned rival. Otho’s rule would last even less time.
Across the Rhine, the legions stationed in Germania rejected both Galba and Otho, proclaiming their own commander, Vitellius, as emperor. When Otho’s forces were defeated at the First Battle of Bedriacum in April 69 AD, Otho chose suicide rather than prolong civil war. Vitellius entered Rome as emperor, but peace did not follow him.
Vitellius’ authority rested heavily on the loyalty of his German legions, while other armies across the empire watched closely. Among them were the legions of the eastern provinces, where Vespasian commanded substantial forces and controlled Egypt, Rome’s primary grain supply. By mid-69 AD, these eastern legions proclaimed Vespasian emperor.
Rome now had its fourth claimant in a single year.
Antonius Primus Emerges
While Vespasian remained in the East consolidating support and securing logistical foundations, the immediate military initiative fell to his supporters in the West. Chief among them was Antonius Primus, a seasoned officer commanding legions stationed along the Danube.
Antonius Primus did not wait for prolonged deliberation. With Vitellius firmly in control of Rome but facing wavering loyalty elsewhere, Primus led the Danubian legions westward into Italy. His objective was not negotiation; it was decisive victory.
The clash came in October 69 AD near Bedriacum, the same region where Otho had fallen months earlier. In what is known as the Second Battle of Bedriacum, the forces loyal to Vespasian routed Vitellius’ army. The defeat shattered Vitellius’ military position in northern Italy and opened the road to Rome.
From this point forward, the outcome of the civil war ceased to be theoretical. The question was no longer whether Vespasian would prevail, but how quickly Rome would fall under his authority.
The Advance on Italy
Antonius Primus pressed southward. The march itself was an assertion of legitimacy grounded in force. Cities along the route assessed the shifting balance of power and adjusted accordingly, offering cooperation or opening their gates rather than resisting an army that had just destroyed Vitellius’ main field force.
Vitellius, still in Rome, attempted to negotiate. He briefly considered abdication, then reversed course as competing factions within the city pushed for resistance. Rome itself descended into internal violence, as Vitellian supporters clashed with those anticipating Vespasian’s victory.
Within the city, the political situation unraveled. The Senate hesitated, the Praetorian Guard fractured, and command structures dissolved. Rome, long accustomed to projecting order, found itself reacting to events it could no longer control.
Antonius Primus’ approach was not greeted by a unified defense. Instead, Rome faced its own disintegration from within before the invading army even arrived.
Fighting in the City
When Primus’ forces reached Rome, resistance flared in pockets. Fighting broke out in the streets, particularly around key symbolic and strategic locations. The Capitoline Hill, a center of Roman religious and political life, became a focal point of violence, suffering significant damage during the clashes.
Vitellius was captured amid the chaos. He was killed by Vespasian’s supporters, his body dragged through the streets before being disposed of in the Tiber River. With his death, the last rival claimant was eliminated.
This was not a clean transition. Rome had been bruised, burned, and humiliated by the spectacle of internal warfare. The city that ruled an empire had been taken by one of its own armies.
The Senate Responds
With Vitellius dead and Antonius Primus’ forces in control, the Senate acted swiftly. Vespasian was formally recognized as emperor. The legal rituals of authority followed the reality already imposed by military victory.
Although Vespasian himself remained in the East at the time, his rule was now secure. The civil war had ended not through diplomacy or tradition, but through the resolution of armed conflict on Roman soil.
The Senate’s decision reflected a broader understanding that had become unavoidable over the course of the year. Imperial legitimacy no longer rested solely in ancestry, adoption, or senatorial approval. It rested in the allegiance of legions.
A Turning Point in Roman Power
The events of late 69 AD marked a significant shift in Roman political reality. Earlier emperors had relied on military backing, but the Year of the Four Emperors demonstrated how quickly armies could elevate and destroy claimants.
Antonius Primus’ march into Rome made explicit what had long been implicit: the empire belonged to the emperor who could command loyalty across multiple fronts and maintain stability afterward.
Vespasian’s accession would prove durable. Unlike his predecessors that year, he would rule for a decade, restore financial order, and begin major construction projects, including the Flavian Amphitheater, later known as the Colosseum. His reign brought a measure of recovery after years of excess under Nero and chaos under his successors.
But that stability was purchased at a cost. The events of 69 AD permanently altered the Roman understanding of imperial succession. The precedent was clear: emperors were made by armies, and Rome itself could be taken if necessary.
Antonius Primus’ Role Remembered
Despite his decisive role, Antonius Primus did not emerge as a lasting political figure in the same way as Vespasian. His importance lies in the moment itself. He was the instrument through which the war was concluded, the commander who turned momentum into finality.
Ancient historians such as Tacitus recorded his actions with a mixture of admiration and caution, recognizing both his effectiveness and the unsettling implications of his success. Primus embodied the new reality of Roman politics, where initiative and military loyalty outweighed pedigree and ceremony.
The End of a Year, the Start of an Era
By the end of 69 AD, Rome stood at the beginning of the Flavian dynasty. The empire had survived a year of unprecedented instability, but it emerged changed. The illusion of seamless succession was gone. In its place stood a harder, more explicit truth about power.
Antonius Primus’ march into Rome was the final chapter of the Year of the Four Emperors, but it was also the opening scene of a new imperial order. It demonstrated that Rome could be conquered by Romans, that authority could fracture rapidly, and that recovery required both strength and discipline.
For Roman history, this moment remains a defining lesson written not in theory but in blood and fire. The empire endured, but it would never again pretend that legitimacy flowed from tradition alone. From this point forward, emperors would rule with the knowledge that their power rested on loyalty that had to be maintained, not assumed.
The road to Rome in 69 AD did not merely decide an emperor. It reshaped the empire’s understanding of itself.

Leave a comment