When King Henry I of England died in early December 1135 AD, he left behind an empire that looked stable on parchment but fragile in reality. His only legitimate son had drowned years earlier in the White Ship disaster, and though Henry had forced his barons to swear oaths recognizing his daughter Matilda as heir, those promises would soon be tested. Within weeks of Henry’s death, Stephen of Blois crossed the Channel, moved faster than any rival, and claimed the English throne for himself, setting in motion one of the most destructive civil wars in medieval English history.
Stephen was not a distant opportunist. He was Henry I’s nephew, the son of Henry’s sister Adela of Normandy, and a powerful noble in his own right. He held extensive lands in England and Normandy, commanded loyalty among influential barons, and enjoyed the crucial support of his brother Henry of Blois, the Bishop of Winchester. More importantly, Stephen understood something fundamental about medieval kingship: legitimacy often followed speed and presence rather than written oaths.
A Throne Without a Clear Successor
Henry I died on December 1st, 1135, while in Normandy. Though he had spent years securing recognition for his daughter Matilda, the idea of a woman ruling England remained deeply uncomfortable for many nobles. Matilda herself was in Anjou at the time of Henry’s death, pregnant and far from England. That distance mattered.
Stephen acted immediately. Crossing the English Channel in winter, he reached London before any organized resistance could form. The city’s leaders, anxious for stability and wary of Matilda’s marriage to Geoffrey of Anjou, welcomed him. With London’s backing, Stephen gained access to the royal treasury and the symbolic heart of English authority.
The Church followed quickly. With the support of Henry of Blois, Stephen was crowned king at Westminster on December 22nd, 1135, less than a month after Henry I’s death. The speed of the coronation left little room for debate. By the time objections could be raised, Stephen was already king.
The Oaths Broken
Stephen’s claim rested on shaky ground. Many barons had sworn solemn oaths to support Matilda as Henry’s heir, and Stephen himself had taken that oath. To justify his seizure of the crown, Stephen argued that Henry had released him from it and that Matilda’s position threatened the kingdom’s stability. These arguments satisfied some, but not all.
At first, opposition was muted. England’s political class had little appetite for immediate conflict, and Stephen moved quickly to secure loyalty by granting lands, privileges, and assurances of good governance. His early reign appeared calm, even promising.
But beneath the surface, resentment and uncertainty grew. Matilda did not accept Stephen’s claim, and neither did several powerful nobles who believed the oaths still binding. What began as a contested succession soon hardened into open rebellion.
The Descent into The Anarchy
By 1139, Matilda landed in England to press her claim, supported by her half-brother Robert of Gloucester. The conflict that followed would later be known simply as The Anarchy, a term that reflected not chaos in the abstract but the lived experience of a kingdom without effective central authority.
Stephen proved courageous in battle but inconsistent as a ruler. He struggled to control powerful barons who built private castles and waged local wars. His tendency to show mercy to captured enemies often undermined his authority, allowing rivals to regroup rather than be eliminated.
In 1141, Stephen was captured at the Battle of Lincoln and imprisoned. For a moment, Matilda appeared victorious, even being recognized as “Lady of the English.” Yet she failed to secure full support in London, and Stephen was eventually released in exchange for Robert of Gloucester. The war resumed with no clear end in sight.
A Kingdom Worn Down
For nearly two decades, England suffered under divided rule. Royal authority weakened, law enforcement collapsed in many regions, and ordinary people bore the brunt of the conflict. Chroniclers wrote of famine, ruined towns, and unchecked violence. Castles multiplied across the countryside, symbols not of protection but of fragmentation.
Stephen remained king in name, but his power was constantly challenged. Matilda never secured the crown outright, yet Stephen never fully defeated her cause. The struggle became generational, passing to Matilda’s son Henry of Anjou.
Resolution Without Victory
In 1153, after years of war, exhaustion finally forced compromise. Stephen and Henry reached an agreement known as the Treaty of Wallingford. Stephen would remain king for the rest of his life, but Henry would succeed him as heir. When Stephen died in 1154, the crown passed peacefully to Henry II, ending the civil war.
Stephen’s reign left a mixed legacy. He was brave, pious, and well-intentioned, but his seizure of the throne in 1135 fractured the kingdom. His claim solved an immediate succession crisis but created a far worse long-term one.
A Turning Point in English History
Stephen of Blois’ decision to claim the English throne reshaped medieval England. It exposed the weakness of oath-based succession, demonstrated the dangers of unclear inheritance, and underscored how quickly political stability could unravel. The Anarchy delayed administrative reforms, weakened royal power, and left scars that would influence English governance for generations.
Yet out of that turmoil emerged a stronger monarchy under Henry II, whose reign would rebuild authority and lay foundations for the English legal system.
Stephen’s march to the throne in 1135 was swift and decisive. Its consequences, however, would echo for nearly 20 years, reminding England that the crown, once taken by force, is rarely held without cost.
Appalachian Post 
Leave a comment