The modern world often speaks of science as though it emerged by escaping faith, yet few figures expose the falseness of that narrative more clearly than Isaac Newton. Newton was not a casual believer, nor was his faith a private sentiment detached from his work. He was a deeply religious man who wrote more on theology and Biblical interpretation than he did on mathematics and physics combined, and he understood his scientific discoveries not as replacements for God, but as insights into the order God had already placed within creation.
Newton was born in 1643 in England and educated at Cambridge, where he encountered both classical philosophy and emerging scientific thought. He lived at a time when natural philosophy was still wrestling with inherited authority, vague explanations, and competing metaphysical systems. Newton did not approach nature as an autonomous machine governed by chance, nor did he see it as unknowable mystery. He approached it as creation, meaning it was rational, consistent, and intelligible because it was the work of a rational God.
That conviction mattered. Newton believed that God created the universe according to precise laws, and that those laws could be discovered because God was not deceptive, arbitrary, or chaotic. This belief undergirded his confidence that mathematics could describe physical reality. Without that confidence, the search for universal laws would have been incoherent.
Newton’s greatest achievements emerged from this framework. He formulated the laws of motion, discovered universal gravitation, developed calculus, and unified celestial and terrestrial mechanics under the same mathematical principles. The idea that the same laws governed falling apples and orbiting planets was revolutionary, but it rested on a theological assumption: God governs the universe consistently, not capriciously.
Newton explicitly stated that the purpose of studying nature was to understand God’s workmanship. He believed that science revealed order, and that order testified to design. This did not mean he appealed to Scripture to fill gaps in data; it meant Scripture gave him confidence that gaps could be filled at all. The universe was not a puzzle without solution, because it was not the product of blind chance.
His work Principia Mathematica did not mention God casually; it assumed God’s sovereignty as foundational. Newton rejected the idea that gravity functioned independently of God’s sustaining will, arguing instead that natural laws described how God governed creation, not mechanisms that replaced Him. For Newton, laws of nature were descriptions of divine regularity, not rivals to divine action.
Newton’s Biblical commitment also shaped his rejection of speculation. He famously insisted that hypotheses must not be invented without evidence. This methodological restraint arose from humility before both God and nature. He believed humans were interpreters, not creators, of truth. Nature was to be observed, measured, and obeyed, not forced to fit philosophical preference.
It is also important to be honest about Newton’s faith. He was not aligned with later institutional theology in every respect, and he spent enormous effort studying prophecy, chronology, and Scripture independently. What matters here is not denominational alignment, but orientation. Newton believed the Bible was true, that God revealed Himself in Scripture, and that creation and Scripture could not ultimately contradict because they shared the same Author.
This belief freed Newton rather than constrained him. He did not fear discovery, because he did not believe truth threatened God. He believed error threatened understanding, not faith. When he uncovered mathematical order beneath physical phenomena, he saw confirmation rather than conflict.
The claim that Newton discovered science despite Christianity collapses under his own words. He understood his work as thinking God’s thoughts after Him, not in arrogance, but in gratitude. The universe was legible because God had written it intelligibly.
Newton’s influence cannot be overstated. Modern physics, engineering, astronomy, and applied mathematics all stand on foundations he laid. Yet those foundations were not poured in a vacuum. They were poured by a man who believed that Scripture revealed who God is, and creation revealed how God acts.
The Bible did not teach Newton calculus or gravity. It did something more fundamental. It taught him that the world made sense, that truth could be sought without fear, and that discovery was an act of obedience rather than rebellion.
In Newton’s hands, science did not become a rival to faith; it became a servant of understanding. His legacy stands as a reminder that modern science was not born from disbelief in God, but from confidence in Him.
Appalachian Post 
Leave a comment