Among sincere Christians, there exists a genuine fear that sharing gifts at Christmas compromises faithfulness, that generosity tied to a date might secretly import pagan meaning, or that participation itself signals disobedience. This fear does not arise from rebellion, but from concern for holiness. Yet concern becomes error when it is untethered from Scripture and allowed to redefine obedience in ways the Bible itself does not support.
Scripture does not treat giving as spiritually suspicious. It treats giving as divine imitation. From the beginning of redemptive history, God reveals Himself as a giver, not as one who withholds goodness until humanity proves worthy. The Gospel itself is framed as gift: God loved the world in such a way that He gave His Son. The incarnation of Jesus Christ is not merely an event to be believed; it is the definitive act of divine generosity, unearned, uncoerced, and undeserved.
This establishes the theological ground rule. If giving were inherently pagan, then the Gospel would collapse under its own language. Scripture does not hesitate to describe salvation, grace, spiritual gifts, and provision using the vocabulary of giving. The problem Scripture confronts is never generosity itself, but distortion of motive, coercion, or idolatry.
The New Testament repeatedly affirms this distinction. Jesus instructs His followers to give freely, without expectation of return, and without public display. Paul reinforces this by insisting that giving must be voluntary and cheerful, not compelled, because compulsion transforms generosity into debt. At no point does Scripture suggest that generosity becomes defiled when practiced on a recurring date, nor does it warn believers away from shared acts of goodwill connected to remembrance.
Fear enters when Christians confuse origin with use. Scripture never teaches that a practice becomes sinful because pagans once did something superficially similar. Pagans ate meals; Christians still eat. Pagans sang; Christians still sing. Pagans marked seasons; Israel itself was commanded by God to observe appointed times. What Scripture judges is not shared form, but false worship and false meaning.
This principle is decisive. Paganism is defined by whom one worships and why, not by the physical act performed. Giving a gift is not worship. Sharing provision is not ritual. Exchanging kindness is not sacrifice. These acts only become spiritually corrupt when they are explicitly tied to idolatry or elevated to the level of divine requirement. Christmas gift-giving, rightly understood, does neither.
Historically, Christian gift-giving did not arise from pagan obligation but from Biblical imitation. The earliest Christian communities practiced material sharing as an expression of unity, survival, and care, particularly under persecution. These gifts were often given quietly, anonymously, and without expectation of return. Over time, generosity became associated with the remembrance of Christ’s birth because the incarnation itself represented God’s self-giving initiative toward humanity.
The Gospel accounts themselves anchor gift-giving near the beginning of Christ’s earthly life. The Magi bring gifts not because they are commanded, but because recognition demands response. Their gifts do not appease Christ; they acknowledge Him. Scripture presents this act without correction or warning, because the problem is never the giving, but the heart behind it.
The fear that Christmas gift-giving is pagan often rests on a misunderstanding of tradition. When early Christians later associated generosity with the season of Christ’s birth, they did not claim divine command for the practice, nor did they attach salvific value to it. They treated it as permissible expression within Christian freedom. Tradition here functions as historical witness, not spiritual law.
Scripture explicitly protects this freedom. Paul warns against those who judge believers over food, drink, or special days, insisting that such matters belong to conscience, not condemnation. This instruction cuts both ways. No Christian is required to give gifts, and no Christian is forbidden to do so. Fear only becomes obedience when Scripture commands it. Silence in Scripture is not prohibition.
What Scripture does condemn is adding burdens God did not impose. When Christians declare generosity suspect without Biblical warrant, they replace Scripture with anxiety. When they treat gift-giving as contamination rather than imitation of divine grace, they invert the Gospel itself, turning freedom into fear.
The real danger is not that Christians might accidentally participate in paganism by giving gifts; the danger is that they might reject a Biblical expression of generosity because of unfounded suspicion. Scripture does not call believers to retreat from kindness; it calls them to practice it rightly.
Giving gifts at Christmas is Biblically permissible because generosity reflects God’s character, because Scripture affirms freedom in non-essential practices, and because remembrance of Christ’s incarnation invites response rather than silence. The practice becomes wrong only when it is coerced, commercialized into obligation, or stripped of its theological grounding.
Christians are not commanded to give gifts. They are permitted to. They are not required to celebrate Christmas. They are free to. Obedience is not measured by avoidance of every practice pagans once touched, but by faithfulness to what God has actually said.
When generosity flows from gratitude rather than fear, it aligns with Scripture. When gifts are shared without compulsion or display, they echo grace. And when Christians give without anxiety, they testify not to pagan influence, but to confidence in the sufficiency of the Gospel.
That fear, once examined under Scripture, has no authority to stand.
Appalachian Post 
Leave a comment